Agency IQ

JANUARY 26, 2024

Such a situation is commonplace in the clinical trial realm, in which investigational drug products which are not already FDA approved are administered to patients. Under the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA) , the FDA also has some authority to extend MCM expiration dates.

Science 40

Science FDA Packaging Production 40

Drug & Device Law

JULY 24, 2023

What’s worse, the fraud on the FDA claim, if brought under state law, would be preempted by Buckman Co. 341 (2001). the relationship between [plaintiff] and its pharmacy benefit manager. . . Apparently, massive loss of evidence was merely a “usual and customary service” of pharmacy benefit mangers nationwide.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials Pharmacy FDA Doctors 52

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 4, 2024

The Complaint further alleges that data collected and submitted in support of full (as opposed to emergency use) FDA approval demonstrated the misleading nature of earlier statements. The FDA, however, did not and does not share that belief. FDA (8/23/21) press release (emphasis original). Health & Safety C.

Vaccine 59

Vaccine FDA FDA Approval Pharmacy 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

But in prescription medical product liability litigation, products must receive FDA approval, clearance or other authorization (hereafter, collectively referred to as “approval” for short) before they can be marketed. to determine whether a proposed alternative drug would have received FDA approval.” at 237-38.

FDA 59

FDA FDA Approval Testimonials Vaccine 59

Drug & Device Law

OCTOBER 10, 2023

341 (2001). 2013), the court held that plaintiff could not “bring a claim that rests solely on the non-disclosure to patients of facts tied to the scope of [FDA] approval.” Finding non-disclosure different than, for example, a claim premised on false assertions of FDA approval. Plaintiffs’ Legal Comm. ,

FDA Approval 59

FDA Approval FDA Pharmacy Regulations 59

Drug & Device Law

NOVEMBER 2, 2023

A court within the Fifth Circuit has held that the FDCA impliedly preempts unfair-competition and consumer-protection claims asserted by a drug manufacturer against a compounding pharmacy. 2023), because it rejects the use of state law to impose requirements beyond those imposed by the FDA. Pharmacy v. Mukasey , 536 F.3d

Compounding Pharmacies 59

Compounding Pharmacies Pharmacy FDA Approval FDA 59