Remove 2001 Remove Regulations Remove Testimonials Remove Treatment
article thumbnail

Let's Quit Sugar With Audiobook – Let's Quit Sugar

The Pharma Data

You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment. Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. A survey of the opinions of obesity experts on the causes and treatment of obesity.

Disease 52
article thumbnail

50-State Survey of State Court Decisions Supporting Expert-Related Judicial Gatekeeping

Drug & Device Law

We think that they can, and for a state (like Pennsylvania and a number of others) that still follows the “ Frye ” standard looking to the “general acceptance” of expert testimony as the touchstone to admissibility, a Rule 702 state-law equivalent might look something like this: Rule 702. E.g. , Walsh v. BASF Corp. , 3d 446, 461 (Pa.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

151, 163-68 (2001)) (lengthy discussion of FDA regulatory process omitted). 7, 2022), which addressed the same question in the context of the admissibility of expert testimony. Another decision in the same case reached the same result: In the United States, the FDA regulates the sale of medical devices. Ethicon, Inc. ,

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Guest Post – Defendant Pitches A Shut Out And Hits A Home Run In Securing Summary Judgment In A Fosamax Case

Drug & Device Law

The court exercised its “gatekeeping” function under Rule 702 to assess whether the methodology underlying Plaintiff’s proffered expert testimony was “scientifically valid” and whether it could “be [properly] applied to the facts in issue.” at *3 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). at *8-10. at *14 (citation omitted).