Remove 2003 Remove Licensing Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Unimpressed Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.”

article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

Without an FDA license to produce another design, [defendant] was legally prohibited from distributing either [alternative design advocated by plaintiffs] at the time [plaintiff] received her vaccinations. 2003), aff’d , 810 N.Y.S.2d 7, 2022), which addressed the same question in the context of the admissibility of expert testimony.

FDA 59