Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

Highlights of the EPA’s Unified Agenda for Spring 2023 The Office of Management and Budget has released the Unified Agenda for Spring 2023, which outlines the regulations that agencies expect to release in 2023 and 2024. This information would be used in considering the regulation of asbestos.

Regulations 40

Regulations Compliance Production Science 40

Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

What we expect the EPA to do in October 2023 In this returning feature, AgencyIQ looks at public data to determine what the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to do in the month ahead, including deadlines, meetings, events, planned regulations, comment periods, and more.

Regulations 40

Regulations Compliance Science Marketing 40

The Premier Consulting Blog

APRIL 27, 2023

Then, in 1997, the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) formed the ICH M8 Expert Working Group/Implementation Working Group (EWG/IWG). In 2003, the original eCTD was adopted by health authorities and sponsors both in the U.S. and around the world, and eCTD v3.2.2,

Packaging 52

Packaging FDA International Pharmaceuticals 52

Policy Prescription

MARCH 12, 2021

Existing law, as found in the Medicare Prescription Drug Modernization and Improvement Act of 2003 (MMA), only allows wholesale drug importation from Canada (if safety and savings are certified by the HHS Secretary). State of Reform does a nice job covering this bill, but this post gives some underlying and important history.

Drugs 52

Drugs Regulations FDA Pharmaceuticals 52

Agency IQ

JANUARY 4, 2024

What we expect the EPA to do in January 2024 In this returning feature, AgencyIQ looks at public data to determine what the Environmental Protection Agency is planning to do in the month ahead, including deadlines, meetings, events, planned regulations, comment periods, and more.

Regulations 40

Regulations Compliance Government Science 40

FDA Law Blog: Biosimilars

JANUARY 9, 2024

After its enactment in 2003, successive administrations thwarted its implementation by declining to certify to Congress that importation will pose no additional risk to public health and safety and will result in a significant reduction in cost to American consumers, as the statute requires. Major barriers still persist.

FDA Approval 57

FDA Approval FDA Drugs Compliance 57

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 1, 2023

Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 2003) (a court that “permits [an expert] to testify as an expert without first determining whether he or she has a sufficient basis” is “abdicating its evidentiary gatekeeping responsibilities”) (footnote omitted). Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP , 2010 WL 1267219, at *9 (Del. Cooper , 496 P.3d

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Trials Science Government 59

Drug & Device Law

JULY 31, 2023

2003), an Internal Revenue Service regulation, excluded liability for “product” refund, repair or replacement. 23, 37 (2003) (“the phrase refers to the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not to the author of any idea, concept, or communication embodied in those goods”). Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. ,

Production 52

Production International Trials Government 52

Drug & Device Law

MAY 26, 2023

We are not looking do either of those, but we will weigh in on what NPP means for non-product liability cases involving FDA-regulated medical products. A state cannot regulate commerce occurring wholly outside its borders. 644 (2003), but not to Pike. Ogden , 22 U.S. Wisconsin , 228 U.S. 115 (1913), and Savage v. 501 (1912).

Regulations 59

Regulations Production FDA FDA Approval 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

2003), aff’d , 810 N.Y.S.2d The court in Wolfe refused to impose a negligence duty on the defendant pharmaceutical company to develop and obtain FDA approval of the plaintiff’s non-FDA-approved alternative. Another decision in the same case reached the same result: In the United States, the FDA regulates the sale of medical devices.

FDA 59

FDA FDA Approval Testimonials Vaccine 59

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 17, 2022

we use[] a “presumption against the pre-emption of state police power regulations” to support a narrow interpretation of such an express command. Thus, we’re pleased to bring to your attention Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. 470, 485 (1996). 702 in a non-prescription medical product case. Wehbi , 18 F.4th Wehbi , 18 F.4th

Production 45

Production Regulations Pharmaceuticals 45

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 30, 2023

2019), or Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. 280 (1995), decision that he joined in 1995 He joined a decision that found no preemption by virtue of a governmental decision not to regulate in Myrick and did not object to boilerplate description of obstacle preemption as an accepted preemption category Then in the 5-4 Geier v. Kent , 552 U.S.

FDA 72

FDA Regulations Production Government 72

Drug & Device Law

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

GlaxoSmithKline , 2023 IL App (1st) 221666 (2003). Based on its own in camera review of the documents, the court “fail[ed] to see” how “what JAMA editors or government regulators thought about [the article] is relevant to the causation question” in the plaintiff’s “underlying lawsuit.” The court granted the motion and JAMA appealed.

Government 64

Government FDA Pharmaceutical Companies Regulations 64

Drug & Device Law

MARCH 28, 2022

Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A lot of the discussion in Tsao was case specific because the purported expert opinions at issue were among the most ridiculous we’ve ever seen – directly contrary to the controlling FDA regulations applicable to the particular drug. 2003 WL 22416000, at *4 (E.D. So we ran a search. at *12-13.

Testimonials 59

Testimonials FDA Regulations Production 59