Remove 2004 Remove Packaging Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Muscle Imbalances RevealedMuscle Imbalances Revealed

The Pharma Data

Here is where some of the health and fitness professionals are from that have been helped by MIR: If you want to see what other health and fitness professionals like you say about Muscle Imbalances Revealed, scroll down and read the testimonials. I have been training clients since 2004. d highly recommend you view. And I think itâ??s

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You Everything the FDA is planning to do in Q3 2023

Agency IQ

That law built upon several other previous laws, including the Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act of 2000, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 and the Project BioShield Act of 2004. But despite the law’s age, it is not yet fully operational.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Article FDA Thank You Congress prepares to markup pandemic legislation, all but confirming FDA-related provisions won’t advance

Agency IQ

That law built upon several other previous laws, including the Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act of 2000, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 and the Project BioShield Act of 2004 ( see a Congressional Research Service report on its legislative history here ).

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Confident Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

Thus a confident learned intermediary’s testimony will defeat causation as a matter of law by stating that, notwithstanding a poor result, the treatment provided was standard of care, and even in hindsight they would not do anything different. Confident learned intermediaries stand by their medical decisions. Medrano , 28 S.W.3d

article thumbnail

Unimpressed Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.” Plaintiff] has not identified any testimony from [the prescriber] that. . .