2005 Pharmaceuticals Testimonials Vaccine 
Drug & Device Law
MAY 30, 2022
The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.” 1981) (applying Virginia law), both of which involved vaccines.
Drug & Device Law
MARCH 4, 2024
Plaintiffs will not be heard to argue that they “could have shored up their cases by other means had they known their expert testimony would be found inadmissible.” His inability to produce admissible expert testimony is due to his own actions, namely the failure of his proposed experts to test their alternatives. 49, 55 (2005).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content