article thumbnail

Article FDA Thank You Congress prepares to markup pandemic legislation, all but confirming FDA-related provisions won’t advance

Agency IQ

BY LAURA DIANGELO, MPH JUL 12, 2023 7:14 PM CDT Quick background: the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) was originally passed in 2006. Congress is already working on the reauthorization process.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Origins of the Lab Mouse

Codon

Adapted from Yoshiki and Moriwaki (2006). In a testimony in front of the U.S. Bolstered by the success of DBA, Little would later create additional inbred strains at the Bussey Institute, including the C57/B6 strain—or “black 6” to insiders, which is the most frequently used mouse model worldwide.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Let's Quit Sugar With Audiobook – Let's Quit Sugar

The Pharma Data

Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. Some of our testimonials are provided by customers who have received promotional offers in exchange for their participation. The testimonials displayed are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. 2006.04.003

Disease 52
article thumbnail

Analysis Chemical Thank You Overview of the U.S. regulation of PFAS

Agency IQ

Data from the 2012, 2016, and 2020 CDR and 1998, 2002, and 2006 Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) Rule are included in the PFAS Analytic Tools. While there are a variety of reporting thresholds, sites manufacturing or importing 25,000 pounds or more of a chemical substance in a given year are required to report to CDR.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You Everything the FDA is planning to do in Q3 2023

Agency IQ

A big legislative question about PAHPA Reauthorization : The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) was originally passed in 2006. to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Dealing with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Non-Decision on Standards Compliance Evidence

Drug & Device Law

2006) – a precedential holding that the same Pennsylvania rule barring strict liability claims against prescription drugs also applied to prescription medical devices − should not be followed because the plaintiffs in Creazzo were supposedly “pro se.” We haven’t seen standards compliance litigated, but T.M. Medtronic, Inc. , 3d 709 (Pa.

article thumbnail

Not the Best Wisconsin Law Decision We’ve Ever Seen

Drug & Device Law

The surgeon’s testimony supported two grounds for non-causation: lack of reliance, and that a warning would not have changed how the prescription product was used. 2006) (rejecting distinction between “a case of no warning as opposed to an inadequate warning”), aff’d , 526 F.3d Wyeth Pharmaceuticals , 471 F. 2d 739, 747 (E.D.