This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Livornese — I saw the sign…and the answer is no—FDA-approved labeling apparently is not enough under state failure-to-warn laws, according to certain courts. That requirement would only be fulfilled if FDA agreed to such a change. But we digress. And indeed, after Pliva v.
Related news Scientific coalition developing surveillance system for detecting emerging pandemics in real-time While combing through the human genome in 2007, computational geneticist Pardis Sabeti made a discovery that would transform her research career. Finding participants for the study would be challenging too.
However, doctors are continuing to prescribe the drugs “off-label” for kids with conditions like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety, depression and conduct disorders, the research found. SUNDAY, Nov. The medications don’t have the safety and effectiveness data needed, nor do they have U.S. .
If an FDA-approved carve-out could support an intent to induce infringement claim, the use of the “section viii pathway would be substantially deterred.” Plainly, the Government brief states “The decision below is incorrect. The Government’s brief puts a lot of faith in the existing regulatory system rather than the patent system.
Until recently, the FDA relied on a monograph process through which firms could bring OTC drugs to market without FDAapproval so long as it adhered to pre-set terms under the monograph. The FDA maintains a webpage with the full rulemaking history for OTC nasal decongestant drug products.
Zidovudine showed promise against multiple HIV strains in cultured cells, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it for human studies within five months. By 1987, the FDA licensed zidovudine after trials showed it increased survival rates. This has happened before with other drugs.
A hundred years later, we detailed three rounds of litigation over Massachusetts’ serial efforts to ban, or at least substantially limit, the use of FDA-approved pain medications. For instance, Sorsaia primarily involves a challenge to a state trying to prevent in-state use of an FDA-approved drug for its FDA-approved use.
The core premise of Bexis’ article is very simple: Once the FDA has said “yes” and approved a particular drug for a particular indication (“intended use”) for sale in the United States, federal preemption precludes any state from saying say “no” and trying to ban that same FDA-approved drug. In GenBioPro, Inc.
After attending a patient education class, seeking a second opinion, being warned that she was at increased risk for revision as a woman, and being warned of a risk of metal ions accumulating in her blood, she went forward with the BHR implant in her left hip on June 25, 2007. at *7 (citing the case discussed here ).
We discussed these concerns – which have since crystallized into what is called either the “municipal cost recovery rule” or the “free public services doctrine” – more detail back in one of the Blog’s early(2007) posts. In other words, the generic manufacturers are not allowed to change the FDA-approved label.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 15,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content