This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Within the realm of FDA-required labeling, there are currently a few different types of information a sponsor might develop specifically for patient use: medication guides, instructions for use (IFU), consumer medical information (CMI) and patient package inserts (PPI).
Final Rule Stage Clean Water Act Section 401: Water Quality Certification 2040-AG12 August 2023 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401 provides States and Tribes with a powerful tool to protect the quality of their waters from adverse impacts resulting from federally licensed or permitted projects.
By 1987, the FDA licensed zidovudine after trials showed it increased survival rates. Starting in 2007, a human trial in Ecuador and Peru found that this drug duo reduced HIV incidence by 44 percent among men who have sex with men; adherence issues likely prevented full protection. This has happened before with other drugs.
2007 WL 2460776, at *6 (D. 2007 WL 218242, at *4 (N.D. 26, 2007) (bespoke software not a UCC good). 2007), held that “defective computer software may give rise to strict products liability in tort.” Buhimschi , 2007 WL 2902896, at *16 (E.D. 28, 2007), aff’d , 396 F. Henry , 2007 WL 2743097, at *2 (W.D.
The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. W]e believe that a drug manufacturer cannot be required legally to foresee that a licensed physician will disregard express warnings regarding a drug’s use. . . . There’s a reason why prescribing physicians and implanting surgeons are called “learned” intermediaries.
In Arizona, a manufacturer cannot be liable for punitive damages if the product was “designed, manufactured, packaged, labeled, sold or represented in relevant and material respects according to the terms of an approval, conditional approval, clearance, license or similar determination of a government agency.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 15,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content