Remove 2007 Remove Testimonials Remove Trials
article thumbnail

Let's Quit Sugar With Audiobook – Let's Quit Sugar

The Pharma Data

Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. Some of our testimonials are provided by customers who have received promotional offers in exchange for their participation. The testimonials displayed are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. 2012.11.002.

Disease 52
article thumbnail

Malarkey ? The Ten Worst Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

We’ve been diligently preparing bottom ten annual lists since 2007, even though it’s distasteful, because if we don’t do it nobody else is likely to, and these abominable decisions deserve to be called out for what they are. While we know that a late-breaking holiday horror, such as T.H.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

50-State Survey of State Court Decisions Supporting Expert-Related Judicial Gatekeeping

Drug & Device Law

We think that they can, and for a state (like Pennsylvania and a number of others) that still follows the “ Frye ” standard looking to the “general acceptance” of expert testimony as the touchstone to admissibility, a Rule 702 state-law equivalent might look something like this: Rule 702. E.g. , Walsh v. BASF Corp. , 3d 446, 461 (Pa.

article thumbnail

Ruling On Motion To Dismiss In A Pennsylvania (Prescription) Device Case Takes Us Back

Drug & Device Law

After more than a month away at trial, we probably should not have picked a case that hit so close to home, so to speak. Instead, it looked to Pennsylvania’s ultimate requirement of proof of expert testimony to prove a prescription drug (!!!) Atrium Medical Corp. , — F. 3d –, 2022 WL 3357485 (E.D. Wyeth , 85 A.3d 3d 434 (Pa.

article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

14, 2015) (claimed alternative could not be considered for plaintiffs who “had their surgeries prior to the commercial availability of” the claimed alternative because it “was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration until June 2007 and was not commercially available until late” that year). Ethicon, Inc. , 3d , 2022 WL 6225596 (S.D.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Confident Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

Thus a confident learned intermediary’s testimony will defeat causation as a matter of law by stating that, notwithstanding a poor result, the treatment provided was standard of care, and even in hindsight they would not do anything different. Confident learned intermediaries stand by their medical decisions. caused anything. 3d 87, 95 (Tex.

article thumbnail

Casting Doubt And Poking Holes—Defense Causation Opinion Admissible Even If Not To A Reasonable Probability

Drug & Device Law

One trial court ruled that way in a hip replacement case in California, and the Court of Appeal reversed in the opinion that prompted today’s post. The plaintiff had hip replacement surgery in 2007, and after allegedly experiencing persistent pain, he sued the hip device manufacturer in California state court. That was the rub.

Trials 52