The Pharma Data

MAY 13, 2021

Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. Some of our testimonials are provided by customers who have received promotional offers in exchange for their participation. The testimonials displayed are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. Pediatrics.

Disease 52

Disease Production Testimonials Science 52

The Pharma Data

MAY 13, 2021

Then these hormones can’t regulate your metabolism like they should…. In a major double-blind clinical trial published in the American College of Endocrinology…. Numerous double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trials have also found Rhodiola to…. It was like the floodgates burst wide open…. So what’s the fix here?

Production 52

Production Packaging Doctors Research 52

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 21, 2023

2023), was the Fifth Circuit’s blatantly politicized attack on the FDA’s regulation of abortion-related drugs. Never mind that, since Bausch the Supreme Court has entertained preemption issues under Rule 12(b)(6) on multiple occasions, including the Mensing ( 2011+1 ) prescription drug preemption decision. FDA , 78 F.4th

FDA Approval 52

FDA Approval FDA Drugs Production 52

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 1, 2023

We think that they can, and for a state (like Pennsylvania and a number of others) that still follows the “ Frye ” standard looking to the “general acceptance” of expert testimony as the touchstone to admissibility, a Rule 702 state-law equivalent might look something like this: Rule 702. E.g. , Walsh v. BASF Corp. , 3d 446, 461 (Pa.

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Trials Science Government 59

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 15, 2024

It is not evidence of the underlying attributes of the product that make it compliant with regulations or standards, which is presumably admissible subject to the ordinary Rules of Evidence. and [defendants’] response thereto, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by disallowing the evidence. Ethicon, Inc. , 3d 1245 (N.J.

Compliance 52

Compliance Government FDA Compliance Production 52

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 29, 2023

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Thus, CEH turned on implied impossibility preemption, specifically an application of Mensing ( 2011+1 ) independence principle. Bonta , 85 F.4th

Testimonials 105

Testimonials FDA Drugs Vaccine 105

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 28, 2023

While Frye was seen as a high bar at the start, by the 1980s, a cadre of practitioners of the ancient art of junk science were routinely permitted to offer medical causation opinions at trial despite general causation being anything but generally accepted. 2011), which might have been our third example above.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials FDA Science Drugs 52