The Pharma Data

MAY 14, 2021

testimonials that my happy customers have graciously sent me from. the doctor, and turns out that it was. The day I first met with the doctor I had a mild headache, fever and a. The doctor told me it could take several weeks to be. The medicine the doctor gave. the doctor told me. on its own. Step-By-Step.

Treatment 52

Treatment Doctors Virus Testimonials 52

Drug & Device Law

JULY 24, 2023

Apparently, plaintiff’s statistician, in considering the post-2011 decline in Actos sales, did not deem it important that generic versions became available in August 2012. This time-tested type of evidence is mostly absent from the analysis in PATDC82 II – as in Neurontin , the only actual prescriber testimony belied plaintiffs’ position.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials Pharmacy FDA Doctors 52

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 5, 2022

239, 253 (2012) (which the Blog discussed here ). The Superior Court here “credited testimony from doctors who never implanted mesh, or who did so outside the state of California.” at 27 (testimony that “large” amount of material had to be “recycl[ed]”). 2020 WL 603964, at *1. “A Fox Television Stations, Inc. ,

Testimonials 64

Testimonials Doctors Production Trials 64

Drug & Device Law

APRIL 29, 2022

The decedent was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in 2012 and died in 2016. On appeal, the intermediate appellate court affirmed, holding that “[the geologist’s] testimony about the amount of asbestos released. The trial court denied the motion.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials International Production Doctors 52

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 6, 2022

Thus a confident learned intermediary’s testimony will defeat causation as a matter of law by stating that, notwithstanding a poor result, the treatment provided was standard of care, and even in hindsight they would not do anything different. 2012), it had to apply the rule. Hamilton , 372 S.W.3d 3d 140 (Tex. Medrano , 28 S.W.3d

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Production Pharmaceuticals Treatment 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

at 287 (citing transcript of expert’s testimony). [A]t A]t first blush, [the expert’s] testimony. No other witness offered testimony on these unidentified standards. An excellent example is the Sherman case, which involved junk science causation testimony in what we call a “toxic soup” chemical exposure case.

Testimonials 64

Testimonials Engineering Doctors Trials 64

Drug & Device Law

MAY 30, 2022

The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.”

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Doctors Production Laboratories 59