Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

0910-AI26 September 2023 March 2023 Final Rule Stage Biologics License Applications and Master Files The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act) deemed any biological product approved in a new drug application (NDA) to be a biologics license application (BLA) on March 23, 2020.

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

The proposed rule will identify certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing to place on the 503A Bulks List and certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing not to include on the 503A Bulks List. The following PDUFA dates were obtained from publicly available sources.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

The proposed rule will identify certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing to place on the 503A Bulks List and certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing not to include on the 503A Bulks List. The following PDUFA dates were obtained from publicly available sources.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

and Annex 1 Conference Joel Welch December 18 RAPS RAPS Webcast: FDA Forecast: What’s Next for the FDA in 2024 AgencyIQ Speakers December 21 HL7 REMS Public Call PDUFA Dates expected in November and December PDUFA dates represent the expected date of a regulatory decision by the FDA on a New Drug Application or Biologics License Application.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

The Pharma Data

DECEMBER 29, 2020

” In May 2020 , Protalix and Chiesi Global Rare Diseases announced the submission of a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pegunigalsidase alfa for the proposed treatment of adult patients with Fabry disease via the FDA’s Accelerated Approval pathway.

Clinical Trials 52

Clinical Trials Disease Treatment Trials 52

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 2, 2022

2012), addressed a challenge to the application of Idaho’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to criminalize the use of an FDA-approved abortifacient medication obtained through an internet prescription and mailed to the plaintiff from out of state. As we discussed here , McCormack v. Hiedeman, 694 F.3d 3d 1004 (9th Cir.

FDA Approval 127

FDA Approval Pharmacy FDA Drugs 127

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 4, 2024

2012), we hailed it as the best decision of 2012. The Complaint further alleges that data collected and submitted in support of full (as opposed to emergency use) FDA approval demonstrated the misleading nature of earlier statements. The FDA, however, did not and does not share that belief. Hamilton , 372 S.W.3d

Vaccine 59

Vaccine FDA FDA Approval Pharmacy 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

2012 WL 956192, at *5 (S.D. March 19, 2012); Holland v. Texas, unlike most states, enforces a strong statutory presumption that prescription medical product warnings complying with FDA requirements imposed by “pre-market approval or licensing of the product” are adequate as a matter of law. Centocor, Inc.

Production 59

Production FDA Approval Vaccine FDA 59

Drug & Device Law

MAY 26, 2023

A hundred years later, we detailed three rounds of litigation over Massachusetts’ serial efforts to ban, or at least substantially limit, the use of FDA-approved pain medications. For instance, Sorsaia primarily involves a challenge to a state trying to prevent in-state use of an FDA-approved drug for its FDA-approved use.

Regulations 59

Regulations Production FDA FDA Approval 59