Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

December 2023 Fixed-Combination and Co-Packaged Drugs: Applications for Approval and Combinations of Active Ingredients Under Consideration for Inclusion in an Over-the-Counter Monograph (Final Rule) The final rule amends FDA regulations on fixed-combination prescription and nonprescription drugs. to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

December 2023 Fixed-Combination and Co-Packaged Drugs: Applications for Approval and Combinations of Active Ingredients Under Consideration for Inclusion in an Over-the-Counter Monograph (Final Rule) The final rule amends FDA regulations on fixed-combination prescription and nonprescription drugs. to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 20, 2023

PFAS are used to repel water, oil, stains, and increase durability, and are found in a wide array of consumer and industrial products including non-stick cookware, fabric treatments, food packaging, cleaners, textiles, leather, cosmetics, paper and paints, fire-fighting foams (AFFF), and wire insulation.

Regulations 40

Regulations Production Packaging Treatment 40

Agency IQ

JULY 28, 2023

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. But despite the law’s age, it is not yet fully operational. The final rule will amend the administrative destruction provisions in 21 CFR 1.94

FDA 40

FDA Science Biosimilars Regulations 40

Drug & Device Law

MAY 30, 2022

The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.” Plaintiff] has not identified any testimony from [the prescriber] that. . .

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Doctors Production Laboratories 59

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 6, 2022

Thus a confident learned intermediary’s testimony will defeat causation as a matter of law by stating that, notwithstanding a poor result, the treatment provided was standard of care, and even in hindsight they would not do anything different. 2012), it had to apply the rule. Hamilton , 372 S.W.3d 3d 140 (Tex. Medrano , 28 S.W.3d

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Production Pharmaceuticals Treatment 59