Remove 2013 Remove Regulations Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

When the Attorney General Talks (Cannabis), People Listen

FDA Law Blog: Biosimilars

Merrick Garland, Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mar. AG Garland opined during his confirmation that he did not think it the best use of DOJ’s limited resources to prosecute those who are complying with the laws in those states that have legalized marijuana and are effectively regulating it. 29, 2013), 3.

article thumbnail

Let's Quit Sugar With Audiobook – Let's Quit Sugar

The Pharma Data

Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. Some of our testimonials are provided by customers who have received promotional offers in exchange for their participation. The testimonials displayed are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. 2012.11.002.

Disease 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You Everything the FDA is planning to do in Q3 2023

Agency IQ

DSCSA implementation – Down to the wire as a deadline draws near: The Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) was enacted in 2013 as part of the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), following several drug counterfeiting scandals in which falsified medical products entered the supply chain. That would leave 19% of staff affected by furloughs.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Another Reason Why The FDA, Not Litigants, Approves Products

Drug & Device Law

22 (both articles for the proposition that there are “‘many intense side effects’ and ‘significant complications requiring medical attention’” resulting” from FDA’s regulation of mifepristone), at *22 n.37 19, 2021) (admitting and excluding Studnicki testimony); Whole Woman’s Health Alliance v. 2013) (Kavanaugh, J.).

FDA 59
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

article thumbnail

Malarkey ? The Ten Worst Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023), was the Fifth Circuit’s blatantly politicized attack on the FDA’s regulation of abortion-related drugs. Bexis’ amicus efforts this year in Mallory obviously came to naught, and we’ve had our own cases on this list before (see, e.g. , 2013-2 and 2021-10 ). FDA , 78 F.4th 4th 210 (5th Cir.

article thumbnail

50-State Survey of State Court Decisions Supporting Expert-Related Judicial Gatekeeping

Drug & Device Law

We think that they can, and for a state (like Pennsylvania and a number of others) that still follows the “ Frye ” standard looking to the “general acceptance” of expert testimony as the touchstone to admissibility, a Rule 702 state-law equivalent might look something like this: Rule 702. E.g. , Walsh v. BASF Corp. , 3d 446, 461 (Pa.