Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug.

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

AgencyIQ October 1 Nitrosamine testing due to FDA. Due to the presence of nitrosamines in certain drug products, FDA had required that drug manufacturers conduct an initial risk assessment of approved or marketed products, with an initial completion date of October 1, 2021, and then confirmatory testing due by October 1, 2023.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

As part of the classification process, we are required to discuss the potential classification before an advisory committee and seek the committee’s recommendation on classification, which took place in October 2014. FDA has proposed to amend the 503A Bulks List by placing additional bulk drug substances on the list.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Drug & Device Law

JULY 24, 2023

The drug is still on the market, and it has other risks that the FDA has found significantly more serious – requiring a boxed warning – than a three-one hundredths-of one-percent (0.0003) increase in absolute incidence of bladder cancer. 2014) (both complete with diagrams). 555, 565 (E.D.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials Pharmacy FDA Doctors 52

Drug & Device Law

MARCH 16, 2023

In two of these cases, our client won summary judgment at the trial court level and an appellate court ended up creating a new cause of action to accommodate the plaintiff’s theory (and lack of helpful testimony from the prescribing physician). 2014) (Pennsylvania law), mucked things up and cases like Yates v. Wyeth , 619 F.3d

FDA Approval 59

FDA Approval FDA Testimonials Production 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

In product liability litigation generally, plaintiffs have been allowed to invent all kinds of “alternative” designs as long as some “expert” opines that the design (even if never before marketed) is “feasible.” Are manufacturers liable only for failing to employ an alternative design that the FDA has approved for distribution. . .

FDA 59

FDA FDA Approval Testimonials Vaccine 59