Remove 2014 Remove FDA Compliance Remove Marketing Remove Regulations
article thumbnail

Dealing with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Non-Decision on Standards Compliance Evidence

Drug & Device Law

It is not evidence of the underlying attributes of the product that make it compliant with regulations or standards, which is presumably admissible subject to the ordinary Rules of Evidence. A plaintiff’s pursuit of such theories thus should allow admission of standards compliance evidence. Coffing Hoist Division , 528 A.2d

article thumbnail

A Thorny PMA Preemption Decision from Rhode Island

Drug & Device Law

It involves allegations against the manufacturer and distributor of surgical clips used in tubal ligation surgery—Class III Pre-Market Approved (“PMA”) medical devices. Plaintiff had surgery in 2014 in which the clips were used. 14, 2024). Shortly thereafter she began experiencing several adverse symptoms, including pain.

FDA 52