Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

As part of the classification process, we are required to discuss the potential classification before an advisory committee and seek the committee’s recommendation on classification, which took place in October 2014. The following PDUFA dates were obtained from publicly available sources.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

WUSF / AgencyIQ November 1 Initial deadline for NDSRIs Under a 2023 guidance document, the FDA has recommended that pharmaceutical companies assess Nitrosamine Drug-Related Substance Impurities for their products by November 1, 2023, with confirmatory testing due by August 1, 2025.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. The following PDUFA dates were obtained from publicly available sources. The final rule will amend the administrative destruction provisions in 21 CFR 1.94 to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

Without an FDA license to produce another design, [defendant] was legally prohibited from distributing either [alternative design advocated by plaintiffs] at the time [plaintiff] received her vaccinations. 7, 2022), which addressed the same question in the context of the admissibility of expert testimony. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. ,

FDA 59

FDA FDA Approval Testimonials Vaccine 59

Drug & Device Law

MAY 30, 2022

The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.”

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Doctors Production Laboratories 59