Remove 2014 Remove Pharmacy Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in October 2023

Agency IQ

Based on the results of its evaluation of nominated categories of drug products to date, as well as consultation with the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC), FDA is also proposing to include certain categories of drug products on these lists. The rule, will also, if finalized, address communication with State boards of pharmacy.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in December 2023

Agency IQ

Based on the results of its evaluation of nominated categories of drug products to date, as well as consultation with the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC), FDA is also proposing to include certain categories of drug products on these lists. The rule, will also, if finalized, address communication with State boards of pharmacy.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in November 2023

Agency IQ

Based on the results of its evaluation of nominated categories of drug products to date, as well as consultation with the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC), FDA is also proposing to include certain categories of drug products on these lists. The rule, will also, if finalized, address communication with State boards of pharmacy.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You The 51 regulations that FDA is currently working on

Agency IQ

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. The rule, will also, if finalized, address communication with State boards of pharmacy. The final rule will amend the administrative destruction provisions in 21 CFR 1.94

article thumbnail

Another RICOdiculous Decision

Drug & Device Law

the relationship between [plaintiff] and its pharmacy benefit manager. . . Apparently, massive loss of evidence was merely a “usual and customary service” of pharmacy benefit mangers nationwide. 2014) (both complete with diagrams). According to Plaintiffs’ expert. . ., at *5 (citations, footnotes and quotation marks omitted).

article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

In at least the short term, a popular pain reliever would have to be removed from pharmacies. 7, 2022), which addressed the same question in the context of the admissibility of expert testimony. Therefore, Davis excluded as “not relevant” expert testimony about non-FDA-approved alternatives. 2014 WL 12685965, at *6 (S.D.W.

FDA 59