Remove 2016 Remove Doctors Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Stand by Your Case? Without Standing, Supreme Court Precedent Means You’ll Have More Bad Times than Good

FDA Law Blog: Biosimilars

Alliance for Nurses started as a Citizen’s Petition back in 2016, making its way to District Court when FDA took no action. In alleging that antibiotic use was a public health problem that FDA should regulate, the plaintiffs offered several testimonials from ostensibly affected people.

Nurses 59
article thumbnail

Article FDA Thank You In unanimous decision, Supreme Court solves FDA’s ‘standing’ issue

Agency IQ

In unanimous decision, Supreme Court solves FDA’s ‘standing’ issue Two lower courts had articulated a Rube Goldberg-esque theory of “standing” – the right of a person or organization to sue another entity – based on the idea that doctors not prescribing mifepristone or treating patients who had taken it had experienced economic harms.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Unblock My Hormones And Start Burning Fat TODAY With HB5

The Pharma Data

Description: How A Handsome Doctor From Texas Saved My Life. I could hear doctors and nurses speaking in hushed tones…. I gave up carbs, fats, alcohol, meat – just as the doctor ordered…. My dear old doctor told me that hormone testing is expensive and unnecessary…. My doctor said it was all simple math….

article thumbnail

New York Court of Appeals Holds that Plaintiff Did Not Prove Causation in Talc/Asbestos Mesothelioma Case

Drug & Device Law

The decedent was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in 2012 and died in 2016. On appeal, the intermediate appellate court affirmed, holding that “[the geologist’s] testimony about the amount of asbestos released. The trial court denied the motion.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

article thumbnail

Another Reason Why The FDA, Not Litigants, Approves Products

Drug & Device Law

On appeal, the Fifth Circuit overturned the District Court’s nullification of the FDA’s approvals of both branded and generic versions of mifepristone but affirmed that court’s voiding of both the 2016 risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) and 2021 non-enforcement decision that allowed telemedicine prescription of mifepristone.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

GranuFlo/NaturaLyte MDL Substantive Rulings – Better Late Than Never

Drug & Device Law

Notwithstanding a settlement in 2016, it’s still up and running, it appears. W]ith considerable testimony from their own experts that all of the plaintiffs fell within an acceptable range, they have failed to adduce competent evidence in support of their claims. Plaintiffs’ doctors were adequately and timely warned.