article thumbnail

Article FDA Thank You In unanimous decision, Supreme Court solves FDA’s ‘standing’ issue

Agency IQ

As reported by POLITICO , “The decision — if allowed by the Supreme Court to take effect — would roll back actions the federal government has taken since 2016 to make the pills more accessible, including rules allowing online ordering, mail delivery, and pharmacy dispensing of the drugs. Read AgencyIQ’s analysis of that case here. ]

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You The 51 regulations that FDA is currently working on

Agency IQ

An update on the Medical Device Quality Management System Regulation : In February 2022, the FDA proposed a new rule which would effectively transition the agency away from its longstanding Quality System Regulation (QSR) in favor of the ISO 13485:2016 standard. Read our analysis of that rule here and here. ]

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in December 2023

Agency IQ

December 2023 Medical Devices; Quality System Regulation Amendments (Final Rule) FDA intends to harmonize and modernize the Quality System regulation for medical devices. The revisions will update the existing requirements with the specifications of an international consensus standard for medical device manufacturers, ISO 13485:2016.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in November 2023

Agency IQ

December 2023 Medical Devices; Quality System Regulation Amendments (Final Rule) FDA intends to harmonize and modernize the Quality System regulation for medical devices. The revisions will update the existing requirements with the specifications of an international consensus standard for medical device manufacturers, ISO 13485:2016.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. The FDA requires real science for warnings; thus it had not mandated any warning remotely resembling Prop 65. Bonta , 85 F.4th 4th 1263 (9th Cir. 4th 1030 (9th Cir.

article thumbnail

Not the Best Wisconsin Law Decision We’ve Ever Seen

Drug & Device Law

2016), “ Probably the Best Wisconsin Law Decision We’ve Ever Seen.” make clear that Wisconsin adopts the doctrine, as consistently predicted by Wisconsin federal courts since 2016. at *3 – which means, as we’ve discussed before , a manufacturer cannot include warnings about such off-label uses absent specific FDA approval.

article thumbnail

Another Reason Why The FDA, Not Litigants, Approves Products

Drug & Device Law

On appeal, the Fifth Circuit overturned the District Court’s nullification of the FDA’s approvals of both branded and generic versions of mifepristone but affirmed that court’s voiding of both the 2016 risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) and 2021 non-enforcement decision that allowed telemedicine prescription of mifepristone.

FDA 59