Remove 2016 Remove Nurses Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Stand by Your Case? Without Standing, Supreme Court Precedent Means You’ll Have More Bad Times than Good

FDA Law Blog: Biosimilars

The plaintiffs in that case— Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, et al v. Alliance for Nurses started as a Citizen’s Petition back in 2016, making its way to District Court when FDA took no action. Following the precedent on standing that the Supreme Court handed down in June in FDA v.

Nurses 59
article thumbnail

Let's Quit Sugar With Audiobook – Let's Quit Sugar

The Pharma Data

Testimonials are not necessarily representative of all of those who will use our products. Some of our testimonials are provided by customers who have received promotional offers in exchange for their participation. The testimonials displayed are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. J Intern Med.

Disease 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Unblock My Hormones And Start Burning Fat TODAY With HB5

The Pharma Data

I could hear doctors and nurses speaking in hushed tones…. And Mary-Anne, a nurse from Arkansas, who says…. For example, a 2016 study in the Journal of Environmental Health found that supplementing with these minerals led to higher levels of T3 and T4 in the bloodstream…iv. But I was paying attention to any of that.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.