2018 Doctors Testimonials 
The Pharma Data
MAY 14, 2021
Billions of Rubles were spent in this “think-tank” of Olympic Coaches, Special Forces Trainers, Psycho-Physiologists and Biomechanics Researcher Doctors. When you do get out of breath, faster than even a world-class fighter, you’ll recovery your heart rate and amaze your doctors! © 2018 RMAX.tv Productions.
The Pharma Data
MAY 13, 2021
Description: How A Handsome Doctor From Texas Saved My Life. I could hear doctors and nurses speaking in hushed tones…. I gave up carbs, fats, alcohol, meat – just as the doctor ordered…. My dear old doctor told me that hormone testing is expensive and unnecessary…. My doctor said it was all simple math….
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Drug & Device Law
JULY 24, 2023
See , e.g. , In re Thalomid & Revlimid Antitrust Litigation , 2018 WL 6573118, at *4 (D.N.J. 30, 2018); In re Skelaxin (Metaxalone) Antitrust Litigation , 299 F.R.D. Without any consideration of what actual doctors did for actual patients with actual diseases, all that was proven was the maxim “garbage in, garbage out.”
Drug & Device Law
FEBRUARY 3, 2022
Litigation over this PMA device has produced two separate preemption decisions that we deemed among our ten worst of the particular year ( #6 in 2018 and #6 in 2021 ). First, plaintiffs complained about allegedly undisclosed opinion testimony offered by a defense expert. We will trust you to fill in the blanks.
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 6, 2022
Thus a confident learned intermediary’s testimony will defeat causation as a matter of law by stating that, notwithstanding a poor result, the treatment provided was standard of care, and even in hindsight they would not do anything different. Confident learned intermediaries stand by their medical decisions. Medrano , 28 S.W.3d
Drug & Device Law
MAY 30, 2022
The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. The prescriber’s] testimony, however, does not establish that he would have altered his prescribing conduct. Given this testimony, the plaintiffs could not “show that stronger manufacturer warnings would have altered the physician’s prescribing conduct.”
Drug & Device Law
JANUARY 5, 2024
Because such a claim did not share “common core of facts” with the original alleged injury—a 2018 stroke—the claim did not relate back to the original complaint and thus was time-barred. Plaintiffs had no evidence to rebut the treater’s clear testimony. 2023 WL 8717570, *3.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content