Agency IQ

JUNE 17, 2024

Under Article III of the Constitution , a party must have “standing” to challenge a rule or law. Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to challenge FDA’s actions regarding the regulation of mifepristone,” the court wrote. None of these theories suffices to establish Article III standing,” the court added.

FDA 40

FDA Doctors Testimonials Regulations 40

Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

The proposed rule will identify certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing to place on the 503A Bulks List and certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing not to include on the 503A Bulks List. The final rule will amend the administrative destruction provisions in 21 CFR 1.94

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. to include devices.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug.

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 21, 2023

Shikada is the first appellate decision creating a state-law warning-based duty (here, via a consumer protection claim, brought by the state rather than anyone actually claiming injury) based solely on pharmacogenomics − racially/ethnically-based genetic variations − allegedly affecting the effectiveness of FDA-approved prescription drugs.

FDA Approval 52

FDA Approval FDA Drugs Production 52

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 29, 2023

2023) (First Amendment bars state-law misrepresentation claims over “truth” of published scientific article) ( here ); National Association of Wheat Growers v. 2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed.

Testimonials 105

Testimonials FDA Drugs Vaccine 105