Remove Compliance Remove Packaging Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in November 2023

Agency IQ

December 2023 Fixed-Combination and Co-Packaged Drugs: Applications for Approval and Combinations of Active Ingredients Under Consideration for Inclusion in an Over-the-Counter Monograph (Final Rule) The final rule amends FDA regulations on fixed-combination prescription and nonprescription drugs. to include devices.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You The 51 regulations that FDA is currently working on

Agency IQ

to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug. To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94

article thumbnail

Analysis Chemical Thank You Overview of the U.S. regulation of PFAS

Agency IQ

PFAS are used to repel water, oil, stains, and increase durability, and are found in a wide array of consumer and industrial products including non-stick cookware, fabric treatments, food packaging, cleaners, textiles, leather, cosmetics, paper and paints, fire-fighting foams (AFFF), and wire insulation.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in December 2023

Agency IQ

December 2023 Fixed-Combination and Co-Packaged Drugs: Applications for Approval and Combinations of Active Ingredients Under Consideration for Inclusion in an Over-the-Counter Monograph (Final Rule) The final rule amends FDA regulations on fixed-combination prescription and nonprescription drugs. to include devices.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Pelvic Mesh Remand Case Fizzles Out Again

Drug & Device Law

37(c)(1) required plaintiff to show the non-compliance was “either justified or harmless.” Southern Source Packaging, LLC , 568 F. Plaintiff also argued that the trial court should have allowed her to offer expert causation testimony from the explanting physician, thus raising an issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

article thumbnail

Mixson Somewhat Mixed, But We’ll Take It

Drug & Device Law

This is the causation variant that we described here as “ not quite physician failure to read ,” since the pertinent testimony was in the nature of a failure to remember reading the relevant information rather than an absolute “never read it” from the implanter. Testimony that the fall was a potential cause ? the defendants won 12½.