Remove Disease Remove Doctors Remove Pharmacy Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Another RICOdiculous Decision

Drug & Device Law

the relationship between [plaintiff] and its pharmacy benefit manager. . . Apparently, massive loss of evidence was merely a “usual and customary service” of pharmacy benefit mangers nationwide. According to Plaintiffs’ expert. . ., is typical of such relationships in the United States, and it includes usual and customary services.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

Infectious Diseases Society of America , 86 F.4th 2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Adequate directions for use were something given to doctors by manufacturers, not by doctors to anyone else.