Agency IQ

JUNE 17, 2024

In unanimous decision, Supreme Court solves FDA’s ‘standing’ issue Two lower courts had articulated a Rube Goldberg-esque theory of “standing” – the right of a person or organization to sue another entity – based on the idea that doctors not prescribing mifepristone or treating patients who had taken it had experienced economic harms.

FDA 40

FDA Doctors Testimonials Regulations 40

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 29, 2023

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

Testimonials 105

Testimonials FDA Drugs Vaccine 105

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 11, 2024

FDA litigation that is now before the Supreme Court. Congress created an FDA approval process that is both rigorous and thorough, and pharmaceutical companies invest billions of dollars in research and development to meet FDA’s scientific standards. We were hardly alone. Studnicki J, Harrison D.J., Longbons T.,

FDA 59

FDA Production FDA Approval Regulations 59

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Plaintiffs included in their motion for reconsideration a lengthy affidavit contending that the court’s decision dismissing their failure to warn claim was based on the wrong physician’s testimony. If accepted, the testimony may have altered the court’s analysis in the second motion for summary judgment. Allied Mut.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials FDA Approval FDA Doctors 52