Remove Doctors Remove Licensing Remove Testimonials Remove Trials
article thumbnail

The TMJ Solution vsl cb | Blue Heron Health News

The Pharma Data

There were what doctors refer to as ‘multifactor causes of pain.’. No searching, no trial and error and no risks of making my condition worse than it already was. I looked at a number of testimonials before trying Christian’s program. And that’s why Christian receives so many testimonials from grateful, happy people.

article thumbnail

Unblock My Hormones And Start Burning Fat TODAY With HB5

The Pharma Data

Description: How A Handsome Doctor From Texas Saved My Life. I could hear doctors and nurses speaking in hushed tones…. I gave up carbs, fats, alcohol, meat – just as the doctor ordered…. My dear old doctor told me that hormone testing is expensive and unnecessary…. My doctor said it was all simple math….

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Fla. Ct. of Appeal Refuses to Force Mayo Clinic to Treat Covid Patient with Ivermectin, etc.

Drug & Device Law

Against the authority of the Mayo Clinic and other reputable sources, the plaintiffs relied on the testimony of a single doctor. That doctor had no relationship with the Mayo Clinic, which is significant because the Mayo Clinic is a closed hospital. None of that was the case with the plaintiffs’ expert. (So

Doctors 64
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

article thumbnail

S.D. Texas Trims Back Mesh Plaintiff Regulatory Expert Opinions

Drug & Device Law

The issue in Robinson was the admissibility of testimony by the plaintiff’s regulatory expert. So much for judicial gate-keeping, Inadequate Warnings to Doctors. But the defendant pointed to 21 CFR section 801.109(c), which says that labels may omit information “commonly known” to licensed medical practitioners.