Remove FDA Approval Remove Government Remove Packaging Remove Testimonials
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in December 2023

Agency IQ

While the FDA previously published a similar version of this document, Congress gave FDA new authority to require these plans. Government shutdown: At present, the FDA has appropriated funding through January 19. Expect nearly every company to be closely reading this document when it’s eventually published.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in November 2023

Agency IQ

While the FDA previously published a similar version of this document, Congress gave FDA new authority to require these plans. Government shutdown: At present, the U.S. federal government has appropriated funding through November 17. the drug and device) of the combination product. to include devices.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You The 51 regulations that FDA is currently working on

Agency IQ

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug.

article thumbnail

Mixson Somewhat Mixed, But We’ll Take It

Drug & Device Law

This is the causation variant that we described here as “ not quite physician failure to read ,” since the pertinent testimony was in the nature of a failure to remember reading the relevant information rather than an absolute “never read it” from the implanter. It is undisputed here that the filter received FDA approval.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (federal government may unilaterally obtain dismissal of FCA claims, and calling the constitutionality of the FCA’s private enforcement mechanism into question) ( here ); Quishenberry v. 2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. Polansky v. 3d 239 (Cal.