Agency IQ

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

Prescription drug advertisements presented through media such as TV and radio must disclose the product’s major side effects and contraindications in what is sometimes called the major statement. This rule also establishes standards for determining whether the major statement in these advertisements is presented in the manner required.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

OCTOBER 27, 2023

While the FDA previously published a similar version of this document, Congress gave FDA new authority to require these plans. Government shutdown: At present, the U.S. This rule also establishes standards for determining whether the major statement in these advertisements is presented in the manner required.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Agency IQ

JUNE 16, 2023

To implement that authority, FDA published a final rule in the Federal Register on September 15, 2015 [80 FR 55237] which revised 21 CFR 1.94 to provide notice and an opportunity for owners or consignees of the drug to appear before the Agency and introduce testimony prior to the destruction of their drug.

Regulations 40

Regulations FDA Science Production 40

Agency IQ

DECEMBER 1, 2023

While the FDA previously published a similar version of this document, Congress gave FDA new authority to require these plans. Government shutdown: At present, the FDA has appropriated funding through January 19. FDA finalized a ban on these devices in 2020, but the D.C. Circuit vacated the final rule in 2021.

FDA 40

FDA Science Regulations Production 40

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 21, 2023

Shikada is the first appellate decision creating a state-law warning-based duty (here, via a consumer protection claim, brought by the state rather than anyone actually claiming injury) based solely on pharmacogenomics − racially/ethnically-based genetic variations − allegedly affecting the effectiveness of FDA-approved prescription drugs.

FDA Approval 52

FDA Approval FDA Drugs Production 52

Drug & Device Law

JULY 24, 2023

This time-tested type of evidence is mostly absent from the analysis in PATDC82 II – as in Neurontin , the only actual prescriber testimony belied plaintiffs’ position. It is not clear that [defendants] will − or even can − avail themselves of a TPP-by-TPP causation defense using doctor-by-doctor testimony.

Testimonials 52

Testimonials Pharmacy FDA Doctors 52

Drug & Device Law

NOVEMBER 1, 2022

Starting with the to-be-published Mixson I , this IVC filter case presented rather complex choice of law issues because the plaintiff implantee was in the military when the surgery in question occurred, and the army sent him to Texas for treatment, even though he was a Florida resident. Testimony that the fall was a potential cause ?

Testimonials 59

Testimonials FDA FDA Approval Packaging 59