Remove FDA Approval Remove Testimonials Remove Trials
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in October 2023

Agency IQ

The proposed rule will identify certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing to place on the 503A Bulks List and certain bulk drug substances that FDA has considered and is proposing not to include on the 503A Bulks List.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in November 2023

Agency IQ

12/29/2023 FDORA, Section 3602 Clinical Trials Modernization : FDA is directed to require the submission of a “diversity action plan” for all Phase 3 clinical trials of new drugs. FDA is directed to issue new draft guidance or update existing guidance regarding Diversity Action Plans for clinical studies.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Analysis Life Sciences Thank You What We Expect the FDA to do in December 2023

Agency IQ

12/29/2023 FDORA, Section 3602 Clinical Trials Modernization : FDA is directed to require the submission of a “diversity action plan” for all Phase 3 clinical trials of new drugs. FDA is directed to issue new draft guidance or update existing guidance regarding Diversity Action Plans for clinical studies.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. The FDA requires real science for warnings; thus it had not mandated any warning remotely resembling Prop 65. Bonta , 85 F.4th 4th 1263 (9th Cir.

article thumbnail

Malarkey ? The Ten Worst Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

Shikada is the first appellate decision creating a state-law warning-based duty (here, via a consumer protection claim, brought by the state rather than anyone actually claiming injury) based solely on pharmacogenomics − racially/ethnically-based genetic variations − allegedly affecting the effectiveness of FDA-approved prescription drugs.

article thumbnail

SJS/TEN Case Survives Motion to Dismiss

Drug & Device Law

We acquired our trial chops in the Central District of California, where we were an AUSA. Not citing any case where such a distinction had been recognized, the Burton court held the difference between SJS and TEN, and the significance of such difference, to be questions of fact “that will require medical expert testimony to resolve.”

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Another RICOdiculous Decision

Drug & Device Law

Second, as for superiority, PATDC82 II admitted that a class trial would face “enormous logistical hurdles,” but nonetheless found a nationwide class action “superior.” Thus, “[o]ne supposed ‘nightmare’ trial is preferable to many hundreds of shorter ones.” 2023 WL 4191651, at *8. But that conclusion is premature.