Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 15, 2024

That is significant because, unlike (now) every other state in the country, since 1987 Pennsylvania precedent prohibited defendants from introducing evidence of their compliance with government and/or industry standards (“standards compliance” or “compliance” evidence, for short) in strict liability design defect cases – generally.

Compliance 52

Compliance Government FDA Compliance Production 52

Drug & Device Law

MARCH 19, 2024

TBI was the first nationwide (or close to it) analysis of whether a given jurisdiction permitted, under state law, a “warning”-based cause of action against a manufacturer of an FDA-regulated prescription drug or medical device for allegedly failing to report adverse events to the FDA.

FDA 52

FDA FDA Compliance FDA Approval Production 52

Drug & Device Law

JULY 26, 2023

2018), holding (as discussed here ) that New Jersey multi-county mass-tort litigation will henceforth be governed exclusively by New Jersey law, no matter where the plaintiff resided. pursuant to conditions established by the federal Food and Drug Administration and applicable regulations, including. . . labeling regulations.

Compliance 52

Compliance FDA Compliance FDA Clinical Trials 52

Drug & Device Law

JANUARY 25, 2024

142 (2007), mere regulation of the product or conduct at issue—the medical walker is a non-prescription, Class I medical device with general controls only—is not a basis for removal under this statute. In those cases , the question is often whether the claims put FDA compliance at issue or whether the defenses do.

Production 52

Production Regulations FDA Compliance Compliance 52