Remove FDA Compliance Remove Marketing Remove Trials
article thumbnail

FDA End-of-Year Release of Warning Letters Impresses (or Depresses)

FDA Law Blog: Biosimilars

Perhaps FDA wanted us to remember 2023 as the year FDA succeeded in uncovering critical defects in drug and device manufacturing, and in critical trials. If FDA wanted to create that impression, it likely succeeded. FDA stated that the firm received 96 U.S. Dextrum Laboratories Inc. Terragene S.A.,

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Dealing with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Non-Decision on Standards Compliance Evidence

Drug & Device Law

A fourth Justice concurred in the result, treating the issue of standards compliance in Sullivan as a matter of evidence, and holding that the lack of a sufficient trial record supporting the relevance of the specific standards at issue in Sullivan meant that the trial judge’s exclusion was not an abuse of discretion.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Thorny PMA Preemption Decision from Rhode Island

Drug & Device Law

It involves allegations against the manufacturer and distributor of surgical clips used in tubal ligation surgery—Class III Pre-Market Approved (“PMA”) medical devices. We do not believe that the trial justice abused her discretion in so ruling. Coopersurgical, Inc. 2024 WL 1109055 (D.R.I. 14, 2024). at 1228 (emphasis added).

FDA 52
article thumbnail

Perfect Defense §510(k) Compliance Win in New Jersey May Be Pyrrhic

Drug & Device Law

From a bottom-line perspective, the most significant result was that evidence of the product’s 510(k) clearance was improperly excluded, requiring vacation of the verdict and a new trial. North Carolina law rejects strict liability altogether. So do a number of other jurisdictions, including Pennsylvania in prescription medical product cases.