A Thorny PMA Preemption Decision from Rhode Island
Drug & Device Law
MARCH 19, 2024
Plaintiff’s primary allegation is that the clips have a migration rate higher than what was reported to the FDA. Since the clips are PMA, the first prong is met—PMA devices have specific FDA requirements. Plaintiff did not allege that the design of the clips deviated from the FDA approved design.
Let's personalize your content