This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To recap: Part 1 of the series focused on providers This part, Part 2, focuses on payers (insurancecompanies) Part 3 (by Marlana Voerster ) will focus on medical-device organizations First off: the bad news in trust for payers Gallup’s polling data among U.S.
Yang pointed out that “the fact that it’s generic is a double-edged sword, because no big pharma company is willing to invest a lot of money in developing and marketing a polypill. It may require either healthinsurancecompanies or governments or charitable organizations to develop polypills.”
Under the Affordable Care Act, healthinsurancecompanies are required to cover the full cost of any screening test recommended by the U.S. Computer models suggest that about 25 colon cancer deaths are prevented for every 1,000 Americans between 50 and 75 who are screened, Barry said. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
While the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits discrimination by healthinsurancecompanies and employers based on a genetic test result, GINA does not apply to life, long-term care, or disability insurance.
Your healthinsurance organization has a trust and understanding problem By and large, healthcare consumers dont trust healthinsurancecompanies. We know this, and the data backs us up. But where does this lack of trust come from?
Prior to the passage of the ACA (also known as Obamacare) in March of 2010, healthinsurancecompanies routinely denied new coverage — or sometimes charged exorbitant premiums — to people with a prior history of illness.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 15,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content