Agency IQ

JULY 28, 2023

October 1, 2023 [link] Regulations Expected to be Published in Q3These are taken from the most recent version of the White House’s Unified Agenda. Specifically, this ANPRM seeks comments, research, information, data, and responses from certain categories of stakeholders that can inform the Agency’s modernization of FDA’s recall regulation.

FDA 40

FDA Science Biosimilars Regulations 40

The Pharma Data

MAY 13, 2021

Then these hormones can’t regulate your metabolism like they should…. Along with the amount of estrogen-regulating DIM that he added as well. It was like the floodgates burst wide open…. And the fat just came pouring off. When your thyroid isn’t producing enough of its two main hormones – T3 and T4…. So what’s the fix here?

Production 52

Production Packaging Doctors Research 52

Drug & Device Law

DECEMBER 29, 2023

2023) (remote trial testimony cannot be compelled beyond Rule 45’s 100-mile limit on subpoenas) ( here ); Carson v. They excluded bogus expert testimony under Fed. Further, “adequacy” is an objective standard, that neither a plaintiff’s self-interested testimony nor equivocal health care provider testimony can touch.

Testimonials 105

Testimonials FDA Drugs Vaccine 105

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 1, 2022

Our favorite part of the plaintiff’s case was the reliance on unsworn affidavits and prior testimony by a Dr. Kory, who stated that he is “generally considered the foremost expert” on the proposed Covid treatment. One doctor wrote an ivermectin prescription based solely on statements from the patient’s wife.

Doctors 124

Doctors Hospitals Treatment Testimonials 124

Drug & Device Law

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

Without an FDA license to produce another design, [defendant] was legally prohibited from distributing either [alternative design advocated by plaintiffs] at the time [plaintiff] received her vaccinations. 7, 2022), which addressed the same question in the context of the admissibility of expert testimony. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. ,

FDA 59

FDA FDA Approval Testimonials Vaccine 59

Drug & Device Law

MARCH 9, 2022

The issue in Robinson was the admissibility of testimony by the plaintiff’s regulatory expert. When we consider the damage a regulatory expert can do, misinterpreting both company documents and FDA regulations to make the company look like Murder, Inc., How does such testimony meet the relevance requirement of Fed. Evidence 402?

Testimonials 64

Testimonials FDA Doctors Regulations 64

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 13, 2022

The FDA’s regulations for medical device labeling generally require that such labeling include “any relevant hazards, contraindications, side effects, and precautions.” That testimony was contrary, not only to the common-law cases discussed in our prior posts , but also flatly contradicted §801.109(c). 801.109(c). 3d at 1286.

Testimonials 59

Testimonials Licensing Licensing FDA 59